BBC News: Is it possible for AI to abolish animal testing?

0
582
Could AI put an end to animal testing? - BBC News

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are revolutionizing the field of scientific testing by providing alternatives to animal experimentation. With the aim of ensuring the safety of drugs and other substances for human use, researchers are now employing AI to accelerate their work. One effective application of AI involves using it to analyze existing global animal testing results, eliminating the need for unnecessary new tests.

Joseph Manuppello, a senior research analyst at the Physicians Committee of Responsible Medicine, applauds the use of AI models like ChatGPT to extract and synthesize available data, as it helps scientists overcome the challenge of sifting through decades of research. Thomas Hartung, a toxicology professor at Johns Hopkins University, affirms that AI is as competent as, if not better than, humans when it comes to deriving information from scientific papers.

Unlike animal testing, AI systems are incredibly useful for checking new chemicals for toxicity. With over 1,000 new compounds entering the market annually, the ability to determine a chemical’s toxicity quickly and accurately is crucial. Professor Hartung highlights that AI’s involvement in toxicity testing has significantly advanced the field, making it more powerful and accurate than ever before. AI is even being utilized to create new drugs from scratch.

However, AI systems are not immune to biases. Data bias, for example, may occur when an AI system’s algorithm is trained predominantly on health data from a single ethnic group. Nevertheless, the efficiency of animal testing is questionable, as exemplified by the case of the arthritis medicine, Vioxx. While it passed animal testing, it was later discovered to pose an increased risk of heart attack and stroke when used long-term by humans. On the other hand, some widely used medicines, like aspirin, would have failed animal tests.

Efforts are underway to develop AI projects aimed at replacing the need for future animal testing. AnimalGAN, developed by the US Food and Drug Administration, aims to accurately predict how rats would react to different chemicals. Another project called Virtual Second Species is training an AI-powered virtual dog using historic test data collected from real dogs. Regulatory approval is the next major challenge for AI testing, although full acceptance may take time.

Emma Grange, director of science and regulatory affairs at Cruelty Free International, emphasizes the importance of ultimately ending animal testing rather than merely reducing or refining it. She hopes AI can help transition away from using animals in any type of test or experiment. Kerstin Kleinschmidt-Dorr, chief veterinary officer at German pharmaceutical company Merck, acknowledges the necessity of animal testing but believes that in the future, better animal testing-free solutions can be found.

In conclusion, AI systems offer a promising pathway to reduce the dependency on animal testing in scientific research. With its ability to analyze vast amounts of data and predict toxicity accurately, AI has already surpassed the effectiveness of traditional methods. However, the road to complete replacement of animal testing with AI-based alternatives requires regulatory approval and continued research.

Questions and Answers:

1. How is AI accelerating the process of scientific testing?
– AI is enabling scientists to analyze existing animal testing results, eliminating the need for unnecessary new tests.

2. How do AI systems compare to humans in extracting information from scientific papers?
– AI systems, like ChatGPT, are as good as, if not better than, humans in deriving information from scientific papers.

3. What is the primary reason for testing new chemicals on animals?
– The primary reason for testing new chemicals on animals is to check for potential toxicity.

4. What are the key drawbacks of animal testing?
– Animal testing is not always an accurate predictor of how a substance will affect humans. Cases like Vioxx and aspirin demonstrate that animal tests don’t always correlate with human outcomes.

5. What are the potential future applications of AI in testing?
– AI is being developed to predict how animals would react to specific chemicals. Additionally, it is being used to create new drugs without the need for animal testing.